vastcg.blogg.se

Do i need older versions of microsoft visual c
Do i need older versions of microsoft visual c











do i need older versions of microsoft visual c
  1. Do i need older versions of microsoft visual c .dll#
  2. Do i need older versions of microsoft visual c update#
  3. Do i need older versions of microsoft visual c 32 bit#

The error message «DLL not found.» simply doesn't exist.

do i need older versions of microsoft visual c

The software I develop is 100% portable (a feature that in the pre-installer era was general procedure), and the final user is free to simple COPY from one folder to another or even from the hard drive to flash drive (or vice-versa). I personally deploy ALL my software static linked and because of that I earn the bonus of don't even need installers.

Do i need older versions of microsoft visual c update#

The ONLY drawback (for the DLL fans) is that if you want to update one library, you need to compile and link again. LIBs are static libraries DLLs are dynamic libraries, and you may choose to use LIBs (static) or DLLs (dynamic). First we DON'T statically link DLLs! We statically link OBJs and LIBs. dll in your application.» this is NOT TRUE.

  • " Redistributing Visual C++ Files" - Official MSDN documentationĮven though some comments said that «link statically with runtime library, but it may cause a lot of problems when you have both.
  • In this case don't forget to add the appropriate "policy merge module" to avoid errors caused by incorrect runtime version.įinally, you can just put required DLLs in the same folder in which your application is installed. It may be done by specifying this requirement in prerequisites property in your setup project.Īlso, you can distribute the runtime dll by including in your setup project the appropriate " merge module". Using /MD is highly recommended to avoid such lossage.Īnother possible solution is to require an appropriate Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable package to be installed on the user's machine. Problems when you have more than one "errno" variable for example. Problem with earlier versions of VS where each CRT would get its own With multiple copies of the CRT in your program. Using /MT is risky if you create DLLs as well as an EXE. To be more specific, I'll allow myself to quote a part of this answer: Possible solution is to link statically with runtime library, but it may cause a lot of problems in case you have both. This is because their compilers link against msvcrt80.dll, msvcrt90.dll, msvcrt100.dll, msvcrt110.dll, msvcrt120.dll and msvcrt140.dll respectively, which are not shipped with Windows. However, if you are developing in VS 2005, VS 2008, VS 2010, VS 2012, VS 2013 or VS 2015, you have to distribute additional C runtime libraries along with your application. Visual Studio 6.0's compiler links against this library, so if you are developing in VS 6.0 you shouldn't encounter any problems on most users' machines.

    do i need older versions of microsoft visual c

    These include string manipulation, memory allocation, C-style input/output calls, etc. This library provides a typical set of library functions required by C and C++ programs.

    Do i need older versions of microsoft visual c 32 bit#

    The only version of the C runtime library which is shipped by Microsoft with most of 32 bit Windows versions is msvcrt.dll.













    Do i need older versions of microsoft visual c